Olivia Gadecki vs Su Jeong Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Gadecki vs S. Jeong Jang

Olivia Gadecki
AUS
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
23
Age
30
-
Height
-
216
C. Rank
614
83
Best Rank
114
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$591.1K
Career Money
$356.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Su Jeong Jang
KOR
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
23
Age
30
-
Height
-
216
C. Rank
614
83
Best Rank
114
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$591.1K
Career Money
$356.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Gadecki 0 - 1 Jang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Olivia Gadecki winning 0 and Su Jeong Jang winning 2. The last match between Su Jeong Jang and Olivia Gadecki was at the W60 Canberra, 02-04-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Su Jeong Jang getting the victory 7-6(0) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gadecki | 0 |
| Jang | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W60 Canberra(04-02-22)
Su Jeong Jang
7
7
Olivia Gadecki
6
5
O. Gadecki vs S. J. Jang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $591,144 | Career Prize Money | $355,985 |
| 61.78% (215-133) | Career Total W/L | 58.88% (441-308) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 13 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 10.00% (1-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
O. Gadecki vs S. J. Jang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Olivia Gadecki has won 40.85% of points on their second serve, while Su Jeong Jang has won 41.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Olivia Gadecki, in recent form, has won 50.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Su Jeong Jang has won 53.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.71% and 33.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Olivia Gadecki has saved 51.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Su Jeong Jang has saved 43.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Olivia Gadecki has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/28), with Su Jeong Jang winning 37.04% (W/L 10/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Olivia Gadecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 141/75), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/7). Su Jeong Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 78/39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/14).
- Player level: In the last year, Olivia Gadecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/11), where as Su Jeong Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 10/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Olivia Gadecki winning 0 times and Su Jeong Jang being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Olivia Gadecki winning 0 and Su Jeong Jang winning 2.
- The last match between Olivia Gadecki and Su Jeong Jang was at the W60 Canberra, 02-04-2022, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Su Jeong Jang getting the victory 7-6(0) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Olivia Gadecki has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.8 while Su Jeong Jang has played against players with an average rank of 392.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Olivia Gadecki has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Su Jeong Jang has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Olivia Gadecki has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Su Jeong Jang has converted 35.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Olivia Gadecki vs Su Jeong Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Gadecki vs S. J. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:22:0 | Average Match Time | 2:22:0 |
| 68% (60/88) | 1st Serve % | 73% (61/84) |
| 47% (28/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (34/61) |
| 54% (15/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (6/15) |
| 43% (36/84) | Return Points Win % | 51% (45/88) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Gadecki 43%, Jang 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Gadecki 54%, Jang 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Gadecki 52%, Jang 51%.
O. Gadecki Recent Matches Played
S. J. Jang Recent Matches Played

O. Gadecki vs S. J. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.78% (215/133) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.88% (441/308) |
| 58.98% (476/331) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.00% (985/743) |
| 53.94% (4001/3417) | Games Win/Loss | 53.43% (8403/7325) |
| 65.28% (141/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.43% (309/229) |
| 59.04% (49/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (78/39) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.06% (36/26) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1173 | Aces Total | 648 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1541 | Total Double Faults | 1483 |
| 1:33:5 | Average Match Time | 1:13:44 |
| 379.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 557.69 |
| 61% (13899/22720) | 1st Serve % | 69% (22776/32967) |
| 67% (9267/13899) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (13885/22776) |
| 46% (4067/8821) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4549/10191) |
| 45% (1297/2860) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2144/4421) |
| 45% (10297/22819) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15916/33979) |
| 48.39% (15/16) | Slam W/L | 41.67% (15/21) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 64.00% (16/9) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Main Tour W/L | 36.54% (19/33) |
| 66.67% (154/77) | Challenger W/L | 59.69% (311/210) |
| 77.78% (21/6) | Futures W/L | 70.27% (78/33) |
| 62% (212/340) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (436/742) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 55% (39/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (71/131) |
| 60% (70/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (125/231) |
| 86% (207/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (412/362) |
| 14% (207/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (412/50) |
| 26% (141/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (337/78) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.84
W2
1.84
03:00 AM 10/11/25
PredictionW1
1.24
W2
3.56
09:30 PM 08/11/25
PredictionW1
1.615
W2
2.14
03:00 AM 10/11/25
PredictionW1
4.25
W2
1.174
06:00 PM 08/11/25
PredictionW1
1.46
W2
2.7
08:30 AM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.109
W2
5.4
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
08 Nov 2025
Novak Djokovic vs Lorenzo Musetti Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Cameron Norrie vs Learner Tien Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina Prediction – WTA WTA Finals – 8th November 2025 Best Bets
08 Nov 2025
WTA Finals – Riyadh Preview And Prediction: Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina Betting Tips & Picks November 8, 2025
08 Nov 2025
Moselle Open – Metz Preview And Prediction: Cameron Norrie vs Learner Tien Betting Tips & Picks November 8, 2025
08 Nov 2025
Hellenic Championship – Athens Preview And Prediction: Novak Djokovic vs Lorenzo Musetti Betting Tips & Picks November 8, 2025
Top Predictions Today
19:00
H2H 8-5
12:00
H2H 11-0
H2H 5-5
H2H 4-5
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 East Lansing
United States
M25 Guadalajara
Mexico
M25 Montreal
Canada
M25 Santa Cruz do Sul
Brazil